Splitsville goes Online; Facebooking, Tweeting, Instagramming and Blogging through Divorce

Earlier this week I received an email from Google+ “Ostara, do you know Attorney Ex, Your Attorney or Your Attorney? “.

Do you know......

Do you know……

I burst out laughing. So that is what my social media life has become? ‘Do you know the attorneys involved in your divorce’?

Forever curious, I clicked on the links, only to find my attorneys are boring and do not disclose anything. Ex’s attorney had a most interesting profile though. His YouTube channel revealed he ‘likes’ sexually semi-explicit videos. We all know YouTube doesn’t allow porn, but these ‘likes’ certainly makes me look differently at Ex’s attorney.

Throughout the divorce proceedings I just regarded Ex’s attorney as this friendly older man who was vigorously defending his client. He was doing his job, it was nothing personal against me, he was just earning a living. Not so anymore. Not after I saw his YouTube channel. No way!

And so your online presence and profile can determine how you are perceived in real life and obviously in court. Anything you say and do online ‘can and will be used against you‘ in Divorce Court. A survey by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers in 2010 revealed a whopping 81% of Family Law attorneys have used evidence from social media in their recent cases. Facebook was the most often cited with 66%. So how is evidence gathered from social media used in divorce cases?

A person’s state of mind

A string of tweets or Facebook postings can be used in custody evaluations to show a parents’ ‘state of mind’. They, your ex, the custody evaluator or mutual friends, see your ‘ranting and raving’ or making disparaging comments about your ex, not very conductive to the strived for co-parenting and not making you a good joint custody candidate.

On some FB pages I see ‘anonymous’ posts by the page owner with questions relevant to a followers specific divorce. It is great to have support and not have to reinvent the wheel so to speak and being able to do so anonymously. However, when you read the comment section, the actual questioner replies with updates. That entirely defeats the purpose!

Evidence of communications

In fault states social media, who you follow, who follows you and are your friends could be a clue to extra-marital affairs. Not relevant anymore in most states, but from your friend list attorney can gather who you associate with and whether that is a good environment for the kids.

Evidence of time and place

Your posts and pictures provide a timeline of where you are and what you do. The husband that claims he is too poor in court to pay alimony, yet post pictures of him skiing in Switzerland a week later. Pictures of the mother at a social gathering drinking and smoking while the kids are supposed to be in her care.

Evidence of actions

Brian McCurk took his ex-wife back to court after he found pictures of her belly dancing on Facebook. Dorothy McCurk was awarded a lifetime of alimony because she claimed disability after a 1997 car accident. Apparently she was also running a belly dancing blog where she stated she had been dancing daily for the past 3 years. Oops!

Your social media and online activity is both public and permanent. My Ex requested in discovery all my FB posts. Make sure you have your privacy settings to the max, but still don’t post what you don’t want the world to know, whether it is through official discovery or leaks by mutual friends. Who knows who took a screenshot of your posts? When in doubt, just close your online accounts for a while, pick up the phone or talk over coffee with your friends.

4 thoughts on “Splitsville goes Online; Facebooking, Tweeting, Instagramming and Blogging through Divorce

  1. Warning to all!

    Text messaging is so easy and quick when it comes to communicating about the kids, however, new apps are appearing where you can ALTER text messages!

    Make sure you keep original copies of everything and that what gets entered into evidence is truly what was written, WHEN it was written, so not taken out of context!

    An example of text altering apps is “Stitch It”

    https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/stitch-it!/id554594252?mt=8

    Like

  2. “State of mind” shouldn’t be used in proceedings. Family Law does not recognize familiar states of mind such as depression. In fact, attorney’s don’t understand state of mind

    Like

    • I agree, partly. 😉

      Neither attorneys nor judges have enough insight in to the psychology of parents to make an appropriate decision, thus they rely on custody evaluators and experts.

      Giving significant time with a parent who has a mental illness, such as schizophrenia, unmanaged bi-polar, or personality disorder, has long term consequences to the child(-ren). It is time attorneys, GAL’s, judges learn to separate temporary and/or manageable states of minds with permanent problems, of which personality disorders are just 1 example.

      The legal standard is the ‘best interest of the child’, yet often parental rights override the legal standard.

      Like

I'd love to hear from you!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s